{"id":15533,"date":"2019-03-15T13:02:15","date_gmt":"2019-03-15T12:02:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.ades-grenoble.org\/wordpress\/?p=15533"},"modified":"2019-03-15T13:10:50","modified_gmt":"2019-03-15T12:10:50","slug":"composition-du-prochain-conseil-de-la-metropole","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.ades-grenoble.org\/wordpress\/2019\/03\/15\/composition-du-prochain-conseil-de-la-metropole\/","title":{"rendered":"Composition du prochain Conseil de la m\u00e9tropole"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"Salle

Photo GK<\/p><\/div>\n\n\n

Avant le 31 octobre 2019, le pr\u00e9fet arr\u00eatera la\nfuture composition du Conseil de la M\u00e9tro. Auparavant, la M\u00e9tro devra d\u00e9cider (en\nth\u00e9orie avant le 31 ao\u00fbt) du nombre et de la r\u00e9partition des si\u00e8ges correspondant\naux 49 communes de l\u2019agglom\u00e9ration, en fonction de la loi en vigueur.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

En effet lors des \u00e9lections municipales de mars\n2020, les \u00e9lecteurs d\u00e9signeront leurs conseillers municipaux et leurs conseillers\ncommunautaires, les deux listes \u00e9tant inscrites sur le m\u00eame bulletin de vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Il est extr\u00eamement regrettable que l\u2019\u00e9lection des\nconseillers m\u00e9tropolitains ne se fasse pas par listes intercommunales sur un programme\nintercommunal car ce vote par listes municipales n\u2019oblige pas \u00e0 faire voter sur\nun programme et un projet m\u00e9tropolitain. Il est souhaitable que n\u00e9anmoins des listes\ncommunales s\u2019accordent pour s\u2019engager sur un projet m\u00e9tropolitain, mais la segmentation\npar communes poursuivra les inconv\u00e9nients actuels et laisse la porte ouverte \u00e0 toutes\nles man\u0153uvres pour constituer une majorit\u00e9 li\u00e9e aux int\u00e9r\u00eats purement municipaux\nalors que la m\u00e9tropole a besoin d\u2019une clart\u00e9 politique forte vu l\u2019importance de\nses comp\u00e9tences.<\/p>\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n

La loi qui pr\u00e9cise la composition des conseils\nd\u2019EPCI peut encore changer puisque des s\u00e9nateurs ont d\u00e9pos\u00e9 une proposition de loi\nqui changerait radicalement la r\u00e9partition des si\u00e8ges entre communes pour les EPCI\n(\u00e9tablissement public de coop\u00e9ration intercommunale). Cette proposition de loi a\n\u00e9t\u00e9 adopt\u00e9e en premi\u00e8re lecture le 24 janvier 2019 au S\u00e9nat et doit \u00eatre prochainement\nd\u00e9battue \u00e0 l\u2019Assembl\u00e9e Nationale. Cette proposition de loi vise \u00e0 am\u00e9liorer la r\u00e9partition\ndes communes de taille moyenne qui sont d\u00e9favoris\u00e9es par rapport aux petites communes\nqui se voient attribuer un si\u00e8ge alors qu\u2019\u00e0 la proportionnelle int\u00e9grale elles ne\ndevraient pas \u00eatre repr\u00e9sent\u00e9es.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Actuellement la clef de r\u00e9partition est fond\u00e9e\nsur la proportionnelle \u00e0 la plus forte moyenne qui permet aux grandes communes\nd\u2019\u00eatre repr\u00e9sent\u00e9es correctement. La proposition du S\u00e9nat propose de revenir \u00e0 une\nproportionnelle au plus fort reste (arrondi \u00e0 l\u2019entier sup\u00e9rieur) avec un nombre\nde si\u00e8ges d\u00e9pendant de la population et du nombre de communes de l\u2019EPCI. Par exemple\npour la M\u00e9tro ce nombre serait de 84 au lieu de 80 suivant la r\u00e8gle actuelle pour\nles m\u00e9tropoles (sans augmentation de 10 %) pour r\u00e9partir les si\u00e8ges avant d\u2019en\naffecter un \u00e0 chaque commune qui n\u2019aura pas eu de repr\u00e9sentant dans le premier\ntemps.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Si l\u2019Assembl\u00e9e Nationale (c\u2019est \u00e0 dire le gouvernement\npuisque les d\u00e9put\u00e9s LREM sont des godillots) adopte cette proposition, il y aura\ndes changements tr\u00e8s importants et n\u00e9gatifs notamment pour les communes les plus\nimportantes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Dans le tableau suivant sont d\u00e9crits l\u2019importance\nde la population municipale des communes connue au 1er<\/sup> janvier 2019 en\npourcentage de la population totale de la M\u00e9tro et les diff\u00e9rentes compositions\npossibles du Conseil de m\u00e9tropole.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

La composition actuelle d\u00e9savantageait fortement\nles communes les plus importantes et les communes moyennes de moins de 4000 habitants.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

La loi actuelle rectifie le poids des grandes communes\nmais minore les communes moyennes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

La proposition de loi s\u00e9natoriale minimise la repr\u00e9sentation\ndes grandes communes et favorise les communes moyennes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Il est souhaitable que la loi actuelle soit\nmaintenue. Ainsi les trois grandes communes, Grenoble, Saint Martin d\u2019H\u00e8res et\nEchirolles qui repr\u00e9sentent plus de la moiti\u00e9 de la population de la M\u00e9tro\n(52,5%) verront leur repr\u00e9sentation \u00e0 peu pr\u00e8s respect\u00e9e (47,3%), avec la\nproposition de loi s\u00e9natoriale la repr\u00e9sentation serait de moins de 40 %\n(39,2%). Historiquement la ville centre a \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9favoris\u00e9e depuis tr\u00e8s longtemps\ndans sa repr\u00e9sentation \u00e0 l\u2019intercommunalit\u00e9, la loi actuelle am\u00e9liorera\nl\u00e9g\u00e8rement cette situation qui n\u2019est pas saine sur le long terme.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
. Communes <\/td>\n % population de la M\u00e9tro\n <\/td>\n Si\u00e8ges\n situation actuelle\n <\/td>\n % si\u00e8ges\n <\/td>\n Si\u00e8ges loi actuelle\n <\/td>\n % si\u00e8ges\n <\/td>\n Proposition S\u00e9nat\n <\/td>\n % si\u00e8ges\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Grenoble\n <\/td>\n 35,7%\n <\/td>\n 31\n <\/td>\n 25,0%\n <\/td>\n 36 \n <\/td>\n 32,7%\n <\/td>\n 30\n <\/td>\n 26,1%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Saint-Martin-d\u2019H\u00e8res\n <\/td>\n 8,7%\n <\/td>\n 7\n <\/td>\n 5,6%\n <\/td>\n 8\n <\/td>\n 7,3%\n <\/td>\n 8\n <\/td>\n 7,0%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n \u00c9chirolles\n <\/td>\n 8,1%\n <\/td>\n 7\n <\/td>\n 5,6%\n <\/td>\n 8\n <\/td>\n 7,3%\n <\/td>\n 7\n <\/td>\n 6,1%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Fontaine\n <\/td>\n 5,1%\n <\/td>\n 4\n <\/td>\n 3,2%\n <\/td>\n 5\n <\/td>\n 4,5%\n <\/td>\n 5\n <\/td>\n 4,3%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Meylan\n <\/td>\n 3,9%\n <\/td>\n 3\n <\/td>\n 2,4%\n <\/td>\n 3\n <\/td>\n 2,7%\n <\/td>\n 3\n <\/td>\n 2,6%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Saint-\u00c9gr\u00e8ve\n <\/td>\n 3,6%\n <\/td>\n 3\n <\/td>\n 2,4%\n <\/td>\n 3\n <\/td>\n 2,7%\n <\/td>\n 3\n <\/td>\n 2,6%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Seyssinet-Pariset\n <\/td>\n 2,7%\n <\/td>\n 3\n <\/td>\n 2,4%\n <\/td>\n 2\n <\/td>\n 1,8%\n <\/td>\n 3\n <\/td>\n 2,6%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Sassenage\n <\/td>\n 2,6%\n <\/td>\n 3\n <\/td>\n 2,4%\n <\/td>\n 2\n <\/td>\n 1,8%\n <\/td>\n 3\n <\/td>\n 2,6%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Le Pont-de-Claix\n <\/td>\n 2,4%\n <\/td>\n 3\n <\/td>\n 2,4%\n <\/td>\n 2\n <\/td>\n 1,8%\n <\/td>\n 3\n <\/td>\n 2,6%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Eybens\n <\/td>\n 2,3%\n <\/td>\n 2\n <\/td>\n 1,6%\n <\/td>\n 2\n <\/td>\n 1,8%\n <\/td>\n 2\n <\/td>\n 1,7%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Vif\n <\/td>\n 1,9%\n <\/td>\n 2\n <\/td>\n 1,6%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td>\n 2\n <\/td>\n 1,7%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Varces-Alli\u00e8res-et-Risset\n <\/td>\n 1,9%\n <\/td>\n 2\n <\/td>\n 1,6%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td>\n 2\n <\/td>\n 1,7%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Claix\n <\/td>\n 1,8%\n <\/td>\n 2\n <\/td>\n 1,6%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td>\n 2\n <\/td>\n 1,7%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Vizille\n <\/td>\n 1,7%\n <\/td>\n 2\n <\/td>\n 1,6%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td>\n 2\n <\/td>\n 1,7%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Seyssins\n <\/td>\n 1,7%\n <\/td>\n 2\n <\/td>\n 1,6%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td>\n 2\n <\/td>\n 1,7%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Dom\u00e8ne\n <\/td>\n 1,5%\n <\/td>\n 2\n <\/td>\n 1,6%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td>\n 2\n <\/td>\n 1,7%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n La Tronche\n <\/td>\n 1,5%\n <\/td>\n 2\n <\/td>\n 1,6%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td>\n 2\n <\/td>\n 1,7%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Gi\u00e8res\n <\/td>\n 1,5%\n <\/td>\n 2\n <\/td>\n 1,6%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td>\n 2\n <\/td>\n 1,7%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Saint-Martin-le-Vinoux\n <\/td>\n 1,3%\n <\/td>\n 2\n <\/td>\n 1,6%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td>\n 2\n <\/td>\n 1,7%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Corenc\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td>\n 2\n <\/td>\n 1,6%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Jarrie\n <\/td>\n 0,8%\n <\/td>\n 2\n <\/td>\n 1,6%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Vaulnaveys-le-Haut\n <\/td>\n 0,8%\n <\/td>\n 2\n <\/td>\n 1,6%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Champ-sur-Drac\n <\/td>\n 0,7%\n <\/td>\n 2\n <\/td>\n 1,6%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Fontanil-Cornillon\n <\/td>\n 0,6%\n <\/td>\n 2\n <\/td>\n 1,6%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Bri\u00e9-et-Angonnes\n <\/td>\n 0,6%\n <\/td>\n 2\n <\/td>\n 1,6%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Noyarey\n <\/td>\n 0,5%\n <\/td>\n 2\n <\/td>\n 1,6%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Poisat\n <\/td>\n 0,5%\n <\/td>\n 2\n <\/td>\n 1,6%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Saint-Paul-de-Varces\n <\/td>\n 0,5%\n <\/td>\n 2\n <\/td>\n 1,6%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Saint-Georges-de-Commiers\n <\/td>\n 0,5%\n <\/td>\n 2\n <\/td>\n 1,6%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Le Gua\n <\/td>\n 0,4%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,8%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Veurey-Voroize\n <\/td>\n 0,3%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,8%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Herbeys\n <\/td>\n 0,3%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,8%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Vaulnaveys-le-Bas\n <\/td>\n 0,3%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,8%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Champagnier\n <\/td>\n 0,3%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,8%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Notre-Dame-de-M\u00e9sage\n <\/td>\n 0,3%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,8%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Le Sappey-en-Chartreuse\n <\/td>\n 0,3%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,8%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n S\u00e9chilienne\n <\/td>\n 0,2%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,8%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Quaix-en-Chartreuse\n <\/td>\n 0,2%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,8%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Murianette\n <\/td>\n 0,2%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,8%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Saint-Pierre-de-M\u00e9sage\n <\/td>\n 0,2%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,8%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Venon\n <\/td>\n 0,2%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,8%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Bresson\n <\/td>\n 0,2%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,8%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Proveysieux\n <\/td>\n 0,1%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,8%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Notre-Dame-de-Commiers\n <\/td>\n 0,1%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,8%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Saint-Barth\u00e9lemy-de-S\u00e9chilienne\n <\/td>\n 0,1%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,8%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Miribel-Lanch\u00e2tre\n <\/td>\n 0,1%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,8%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Montchaboud\n <\/td>\n 0,1%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,8%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Sarcenas\n <\/td>\n 0,0%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,8%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Mont-Saint-Martin\n <\/td>\n 0,0%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,8%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td>\n 1\n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Total<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n 100,0%<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n 124<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n 100,0%<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n 110<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n 100,0%<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n 115<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n 100,0%<\/strong>\n <\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n

Une circulaire du minist\u00e8re de l\u2019int\u00e9rieur <\/a>rappelle la loi actuelle.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Voir ici<\/a> la proposition de loi qui va \u00eatre d\u00e9battue \u00e0 l\u2019Assembl\u00e9e Nationale.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Avant le 31 octobre 2019, le pr\u00e9fet arr\u00eatera la future composition du Conseil de la M\u00e9tro. Auparavant, la M\u00e9tro devra d\u00e9cider (en th\u00e9orie avant le 31 ao\u00fbt) du nombre et de la r\u00e9partition des si\u00e8ges correspondant aux 49 communes de l\u2019agglom\u00e9ration, en fonction de la loi en vigueur. En effet lors des \u00e9lections municipales de […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"twitterCardType":"","cardImageID":0,"cardImage":"","cardTitle":"","cardDesc":"","cardImageAlt":"","cardPlayer":"","cardPlayerWidth":0,"cardPlayerHeight":0,"cardPlayerStream":"","cardPlayerCodec":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[62,11],"tags":[140,166,280],"class_list":["post-15533","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-le-rouge-le-vert-hebdo","category-politique-locale","tag-elections","tag-loi","tag-metropole"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ades-grenoble.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15533","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ades-grenoble.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ades-grenoble.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ades-grenoble.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ades-grenoble.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15533"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.ades-grenoble.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15533\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":15534,"href":"https:\/\/www.ades-grenoble.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15533\/revisions\/15534"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ades-grenoble.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15533"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ades-grenoble.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15533"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ades-grenoble.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15533"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}