{"id":16702,"date":"2020-01-10T16:33:49","date_gmt":"2020-01-10T15:33:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.ades-grenoble.org\/wordpress\/?p=16702"},"modified":"2020-01-10T17:00:27","modified_gmt":"2020-01-10T16:00:27","slug":"populations-2017-de-grenoble-et-de-la-metropole","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.ades-grenoble.org\/wordpress\/2020\/01\/10\/populations-2017-de-grenoble-et-de-la-metropole\/","title":{"rendered":"Populations 2017 de Grenoble et de la M\u00e9tropole"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

Chaque\nfin d\u2019ann\u00e9e, l\u2019INSEE publie les r\u00e9sultats du recensement concernant les\npopulations l\u00e9gales de chaque commune. Il s\u2019agit de la population municipale et\nde la population compt\u00e9e \u00e0 part issues du recensement 2017. L\u2019INSEE pr\u00e9cise\nqu\u2019il faut comparer les r\u00e9sultats du recensement 2017 avec celui de 2012 et de\n2007 et qu\u2019il ne faut pas faire une comparaison ann\u00e9e apr\u00e8s ann\u00e9e. En effet le\nrecensement dat\u00e9 de 2017 utilise des donn\u00e9es de 2015 \u00e0 2019 ; chaque ann\u00e9e\nc\u2019est seulement un \u00e9chantillon de 8% des habitants qui est recens\u00e9.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Les\nr\u00e9sultats pour Grenoble montrent une stabilisation de la population :<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n 2007\n <\/td>\n 2012\n <\/td>\n 2017\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Population municipale\n <\/td>\n 156793\n <\/td>\n 158346\n <\/td>\n 158454\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Population compt\u00e9e \u00e0 part\n <\/td>\n 2617\n <\/td>\n 2725\n <\/td>\n 2171\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Population totale\n <\/td>\n 159410\n <\/td>\n 161071\n <\/td>\n 160625\n <\/td><\/tr><\/table>\n\n\n\n

Le\nrecensement 2016 donnait les r\u00e9sultats suivants :<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n 2006\n <\/td>\n 2011\n <\/td>\n 2016\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Population municipale\n <\/td>\n 156107\n <\/td>\n 157424\n <\/td>\n 158180\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Population compt\u00e9e \u00e0 part\n <\/td>\n 2639\n <\/td>\n 2529\n <\/td>\n 2656\n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Population totale\n <\/td>\n 158746\n <\/td>\n 159953\n <\/td>\n 160836\n <\/td><\/tr><\/table>\n\n\n\n

Rappel\ndes d\u00e9finitions :<\/p>\n\n\n\n

– Population municipale : \u00ab comprend les personnes ayant leur r\u00e9sidence\nhabituelle sur le territoire de la commune, dans un logement ou une communaut\u00e9,\nles personnes d\u00e9tenues dans les \u00e9tablissements p\u00e9nitentiaires de la commune,\nles personnes sans-abri recens\u00e9es sur le territoire de la commune et les\npersonnes r\u00e9sidant habituellement dans une habitation mobile recens\u00e9e sur le\nterritoire de la commune.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

La population\nmunicipale d’un ensemble de communes est \u00e9gale \u00e0 la somme des populations\nmunicipales des communes qui le composent. Le concept de population municipale\ncorrespond d\u00e9sormais \u00e0 la notion de population utilis\u00e9e usuellement en\nstatistique. En effet, elle ne comporte pas de doubles comptes : chaque\npersonne vivant en France est compt\u00e9e une fois et une seule \u00bb<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

–<\/em><\/strong> <\/strong>Population compt\u00e9e \u00e0 part :\n\u00ab comprend certaines personnes dont la r\u00e9sidence habituelle est dans\nune autre commune mais qui ont conserv\u00e9 une r\u00e9sidence sur le territoire de la\ncommune. Les mineurs dont la r\u00e9sidence familiale est dans une autre commune\nmais qui r\u00e9sident, du fait de leurs \u00e9tudes, dans la commune ; les personnes\nmajeures \u00e2g\u00e9es de moins de 25 ans ayant leur r\u00e9sidence familiale sur le\nterritoire de la commune et qui r\u00e9sident dans une autre commune pour leurs\n\u00e9tudes\u2026 \u00bb<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Pour les\n49 communes de la M\u00e9tro les \u00e9volutions sont indiqu\u00e9es dans le tableau suivant. L\u2019\u00e9volution\nglobale est tr\u00e8s faible (1% en 5 ans entre 2012 et 2017).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Les\ncommunes qui ont des baisses sont Meylan, Seyssinet, Le Pont de Claix, Vizille,\nJarrie, Champ sur Drac, Le Gua, Notre Dame de M\u00e9sage\u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Celles\nqui voient leur population augmenter : Saint Martin d\u2019H\u00e8res, Echirolles,\nEybens, Vif, Varces, Claix, Seyssins, Gi\u00e8res, Dom\u00e8ne, Saint Martin le Vinoux,\nCorenc, Vaulnaveys le Haut \u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A noter\nque les populations 2017 ne changeraient pas la composition du conseil de\nM\u00e9tropole qui a \u00e9t\u00e9 arr\u00eat\u00e9e en prenant comme r\u00e9f\u00e9rence la population 2016.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n Communes\n <\/td>\n Population municipale 2017\n <\/td>\n Evolution 2017\/2012\n <\/td>\n  Population\n municipale 2012 \n <\/td>\n Evolution 2012\/2007\n <\/td>\n  Population\n municipale 2007 \n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Grenoble\n <\/td>\n 158 454\n <\/td>\n 0,1%\n <\/td>\n             \n 158 346\n <\/td>\n 1,0%\n <\/td>\n             \n 156 793 \n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Saint-Martin-d\u2019H\u00e8res\n <\/td>\n 38 487\n <\/td>\n 1,0%\n <\/td>\n                 \n 38 105 \n <\/td>\n 7,3%\n <\/td>\n                \n 35 502 \n <\/td><\/tr>
\n \u00c9chirolles\n <\/td>\n 36 840\n <\/td>\n 2,8%\n <\/td>\n                \n 35 826 \n <\/td>\n 1,3%\n <\/td>\n                \n 35 383 \n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Fontaine\n <\/td>\n 22 523\n <\/td>\n 2,1%\n <\/td>\n             \n    22 050 \n <\/td>\n -1,5%\n <\/td>\n                \n 22 394 \n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Meylan\n <\/td>\n 17 129\n <\/td>\n -2,9%\n <\/td>\n                \n 17 646 \n <\/td>\n 2,6%\n <\/td>\n                \n 17 200 \n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Saint-\u00c9gr\u00e8ve\n <\/td>\n 15 838\n <\/td>\n -2,1%\n <\/td>\n                \n 16 176 \n <\/td>\n 4,8%\n <\/td>\n                \n 15 432 \n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Seyssinet-Pariset\n <\/td>\n 12 013\n <\/td>\n -1,1%\n <\/td>\n                \n 12 147 \n <\/td>\n -3,5%\n <\/td>\n                \n 12 582 \n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Sassenage\n <\/td>\n 11 376\n <\/td>\n -0,8%\n <\/td>\n                \n 11 473 \n <\/td>\n 7,9%\n <\/td>\n                \n 10 631 \n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Le Pont-de-Claix\n <\/td>\n 10 435\n <\/td>\n -7,3%\n <\/td>\n                \n 11 259 \n <\/td>\n -2,8%\n <\/td>\n                \n 11 585 \n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Eybens\n <\/td>\n 10 185\n <\/td>\n 2,4%\n <\/td>\n                  \n 9 944 \n <\/td>\n 7,4%\n <\/td>\n                  \n 9 262 \n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Vif\n <\/td>\n 8 532\n <\/td>\n 7,0%\n <\/td>\n                  \n 7 975 \n <\/td>\n -0,9%\n <\/td>\n                  \n 8 050 \n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Varces-Alli\u00e8res-et-Risset\n <\/td>\n 8 250\n <\/td>\n 25,3%\n <\/td>\n                  \n 6 583 \n <\/td>\n -0,4%\n <\/td>\n                  \n 6 609 \n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Claix\n <\/td>\n 7 932\n <\/td>\n 2,7%\n <\/td>\n                  \n 7 727 \n <\/td>\n 1,9%\n <\/td>\n                  \n 7 585 \n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Seyssins\n <\/td>\n 7 685\n <\/td>\n 10,3%\n <\/td>\n                  \n 6 970 \n <\/td>\n 0,9%\n <\/td>\n                  \n 6 908 \n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Vizille\n <\/td>\n 7 361\n <\/td>\n -3,7%\n <\/td>\n                  \n 7 647 \n <\/td>\n -0,9%\n <\/td>\n                  \n 7 714 \n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Gi\u00e8res\n <\/td>\n 6 779\n <\/td>\n 9,3%\n <\/td>\n                  \n 6 200 \n <\/td>\n 0,6%\n <\/td>\n                  \n 6 161 \n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Dom\u00e8ne\n <\/td>\n 6 745\n <\/td>\n 2,4%\n <\/td>\n                  \n 6 588 \n <\/td>\n 0,4%\n <\/td>\n                  \n 6 562 \n <\/td><\/tr>
\n La Tronche\n <\/td>\n 6 596\n <\/td>\n -0,5%\n <\/td>\n                  \n 6 627 \n <\/td>\n 9,0%\n <\/td>\n                  \n 6 079 \n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Saint-Martin-le-Vinoux\n <\/td>\n 5 778\n <\/td>\n 5,9%\n <\/td>\n                  \n 5 455 \n <\/td>\n 2,0%\n <\/td>\n                  \n 5 348 \n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Corenc\n <\/td>\n 4 013\n <\/td>\n 1,7%\n <\/td>\n                  \n 3 944 \n <\/td>\n 4,5%\n <\/td>\n                   3 773 \n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Vaulnaveys-le-Haut\n <\/td>\n 3 867\n <\/td>\n 6,4%\n <\/td>\n                  \n 3 635 \n <\/td>\n 8,0%\n <\/td>\n                  \n 3 367 \n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Jarrie\n <\/td>\n 3 746\n <\/td>\n -2,0%\n <\/td>\n                  \n 3 823 \n <\/td>\n -0,6%\n <\/td>\n                  \n 3 847 \n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Champ-sur-Drac\n <\/td>\n 3 007\n <\/td>\n -2,9%\n <\/td>\n                  \n 3 097 \n <\/td>\n -1,6%\n <\/td>\n            \n       3 146 \n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Fontanil-Cornillon\n <\/td>\n 2 710\n <\/td>\n -3,1%\n <\/td>\n                  \n 2 796 \n <\/td>\n 3,7%\n <\/td>\n                  \n 2 696 \n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Bri\u00e9-et-Angonnes\n <\/td>\n 2 556\n <\/td>\n 3,0%\n <\/td>\n                  \n 2 482 \n <\/td>\n 8,5%\n <\/td>\n                  \n 2 288 \n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Saint-Georges-de-Commiers\n <\/td>\n 2 276\n <\/td>\n 7,9%\n <\/td>\n                  \n 2 110 \n <\/td>\n 4,8%\n <\/td>\n                   2 013 \n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Noyarey\n <\/td>\n 2 223\n <\/td>\n -1,8%\n <\/td>\n                  \n 2 263 \n <\/td>\n 9,6%\n <\/td>\n                  \n 2 064 \n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Saint-Paul-de-Varces\n <\/td>\n 2 173\n <\/td>\n -1,9%\n <\/td>\n                  \n 2 216 \n <\/td>\n 10,4%\n <\/td>\n                  \n 2 008 \n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Poisat\n <\/td>\n 2 168\n <\/td>\n 3,0%\n <\/td>\n                  \n 2 105 \n <\/td>\n 1,3%\n <\/td>\n                  \n 2 079 \n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Le Gua\n <\/td>\n 1 779\n <\/td>\n -3,3%\n <\/td>\n                  \n 1 839 \n <\/td>\n -0,9%\n <\/td>\n                  \n 1 855 \n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Veurey-Voroize\n <\/td>\n 1 438\n <\/td>\n 3,0%\n <\/td>\n                  \n 1 396 \n <\/td>\n 1,7%\n <\/td>\n                  \n 1 372 \n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Herbeys\n <\/td>\n 1 361\n <\/td>\n 0,7%\n <\/td>\n                  \n 1 352 \n <\/td>\n 5,1%\n <\/td>\n                  \n 1 287 \n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Vaulnaveys-le-Bas\n <\/td>\n 1 282\n <\/td>\n 5,6%\n <\/td>\n                  \n 1 214 \n <\/td>\n 10,8%\n <\/td>\n                  \n 1 096 \n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Champagnier\n <\/td>\n 1 226\n <\/td>\n -4,1%\n <\/td>\n                  \n 1 278 \n <\/td>\n 11,9%\n <\/td>\n                  \n 1 142 \n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Notre-Dame-de-M\u00e9sage\n <\/td>\n 1 147\n <\/td>\n -4,7%\n <\/td>\n                  \n 1 203 \n <\/td>\n -1,0%\n <\/td>\n                  \n 1 215 \n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Le Sappey-en-Chartreuse\n <\/td>\n 1 121\n <\/td>\n 1,8%\n <\/td>\n                  \n 1 101 \n <\/td>\n 7,3%\n <\/td>\n                  \n 1 026 \n <\/td><\/tr>
\n S\u00e9chilienne\n <\/td>\n 1 052\n <\/td>\n 9,2%\n <\/td>\n                      963 \n <\/td>\n 10,7%\n <\/td>\n                      870 \n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Quaix-en-Chartreuse\n <\/td>\n 893\n <\/td>\n -2,9%\n <\/td>\n                      920 \n <\/td>\n 3,8%\n <\/td>\n                      886 \n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Murianette\n <\/td>\n 882\n <\/td>\n -0,1%\n <\/td>\n                      883 \n <\/td>\n 18,4%\n <\/td>\n                      746 \n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Saint-Pierre-de-M\u00e9sage\n <\/td>\n 764\n <\/td>\n 3,9%\n <\/td>\n                      735 \n <\/td>\n 3,8%\n <\/td>\n                      708 \n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Venon\n <\/td>\n 729\n <\/td>\n -0,4%\n <\/td>\n                      732 \n <\/td>\n 5,0%\n <\/td>\n                      697 \n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Bresson\n <\/td>\n 684\n <\/td>\n -0,3%\n <\/td>\n                      686 \n <\/td>\n -1,4%\n <\/td>\n                      696 \n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Notre-Dame-de-Commiers\n <\/td>\n 518\n <\/td>\n 12,6%\n <\/td>\n                      460 \n <\/td>\n -0,6%\n <\/td>\n                      463 \n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Proveysieux\n <\/td>\n 507\n <\/td>\n -1,2%\n <\/td>\n                      513 \n <\/td>\n -0,4%\n <\/td>\n                      515 \n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Saint-Barth\u00e9lemy-de-S\u00e9chilienne\n <\/td>\n 433\n <\/td>\n -11,1%\n <\/td>\n                      487 \n <\/td>\n 7,3%\n <\/td>\n                      454 \n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Miribel-Lanch\u00e2tre\n <\/td>\n 433\n <\/td>\n 12,5%\n <\/td>\n                      385 \n <\/td>\n 13,6%\n <\/td>\n                      339 \n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Montchaboud\n <\/td>\n 339\n <\/td>\n -7,9%\n <\/td>\n                      368 \n <\/td>\n 4,0%\n <\/td>\n                      354 \n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Sarcenas\n <\/td>\n 189\n <\/td>\n -5,5%\n <\/td>\n                      200 \n <\/td>\n 7,0%\n <\/td>\n                      187 \n <\/td><\/tr>
\n Mont-Saint-Martin\n <\/td>\n 79\n <\/td>\n -3,7%\n <\/td>\n                        82 \n <\/td>\n -14,6%\n <\/td>\n                        96 \n <\/td><\/tr>
\n METRO<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n 444 533<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n 1,0%<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n 440 012<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n 2,1%<\/strong>\n <\/td>\n            \n 431 065 <\/strong>\n <\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Chaque fin d\u2019ann\u00e9e, l\u2019INSEE publie les r\u00e9sultats du recensement concernant les populations l\u00e9gales de chaque commune. Il s\u2019agit de la population municipale et de la population compt\u00e9e \u00e0 part issues du recensement 2017. L\u2019INSEE pr\u00e9cise qu\u2019il faut comparer les r\u00e9sultats du recensement 2017 avec celui de 2012 et de 2007 et qu\u2019il ne faut pas […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"twitterCardType":"","cardImageID":0,"cardImage":"","cardTitle":"","cardDesc":"","cardImageAlt":"","cardPlayer":"","cardPlayerWidth":0,"cardPlayerHeight":0,"cardPlayerStream":"","cardPlayerCodec":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[62,11],"tags":[161,215,285,280],"class_list":["post-16702","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-le-rouge-le-vert-hebdo","category-politique-locale","tag-demographie","tag-grenoble","tag-insee","tag-metropole"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ades-grenoble.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16702","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ades-grenoble.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ades-grenoble.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ades-grenoble.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ades-grenoble.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16702"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.ades-grenoble.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16702\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16715,"href":"https:\/\/www.ades-grenoble.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16702\/revisions\/16715"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ades-grenoble.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16702"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ades-grenoble.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16702"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ades-grenoble.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16702"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}